GVI vs Projects Abroad: Which Is Better for Volunteering Abroad?
Two well-known international volunteer providers with different specialisms. Based on publicly available positioning at time of writing — verify with each provider directly.
Last updated:
Quick verdict
- Conservation specialist: GVI.
- Broadest program menu: Projects Abroad.
- Professional placements (medical, law, journalism): Projects Abroad.
- Long-term research roles: GVI.
- For both: ask for safeguarding policy + fee breakdown in writing.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | Projects Abroad | |
|---|---|---|
| Specialism | Conservation, community research, long-term data programs | Broad — teaching, healthcare, professional placements |
| Typical weekly cost | USD 400–800 | USD 400–900 |
| Country coverage | ~13 countries, deeper at each site | ~20 countries, broader menu |
| Best for | Biology/ecology students, long-term volunteers, research-focused roles | First-timers wanting variety, professional placements, broader country choice |
| Minimum stay | 2 weeks; many programs favour longer commitment | 2 weeks across most programs |
| In-country support | Long-tenured base teams; ecological research methodology | Structured orientation; professional placement supervision |
| Ethical positioning | Strong public commitment to no orphanage placements; conservation ethics published | Public ethics charter; moved away from orphanage placements |
Verify current details with each provider before booking.
FAQs
- What's the main difference between GVI and Projects Abroad?
- GVI is conservation- and community-research-led, with deeper engagement on a smaller set of sites. Projects Abroad has broader country and program coverage including professional placements. Pick GVI for long-term conservation; pick Projects Abroad for a wider menu.
- Which is more ethical?
- Both publish ethics statements and have moved away from orphanage placements. We can't certify either operator. Use our program review methodology with both: ask for the safeguarding policy, fee breakdown and recent volunteer references in writing.
- Which is better for conservation volunteers?
- GVI is widely regarded as the stronger conservation specialist with longer-term ecological data programs. Projects Abroad's conservation arm is competent but less specialised. For research-style work, GVI typically wins.
- Which is cheaper?
- Both sit in the mid/premium tier. Per-week prices are broadly comparable. GVI's conservation programs are often slightly cheaper than Projects Abroad's professional placements; Projects Abroad's volunteer-tier programs are similar to GVI's standard rates. Always confirm current pricing directly.
- Are they both safe for first-time volunteers?
- Yes — both have established in-country support, emergency procedures and structured orientation. The deciding factor is usually program type fit rather than provider safety.
Free planning tools
Related guides
Written by
Volunteer World Guide editorial team
Ethical-volunteering research desk
Researched and reviewed by the Volunteer World Guide editorial team based on publicly available provider positioning. See our editorial policy.
Last updated